{"id":15687,"date":"2020-02-13T08:46:40","date_gmt":"2020-02-13T08:46:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/?p=15687"},"modified":"2024-01-12T08:50:34","modified_gmt":"2024-01-12T08:50:34","slug":"draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/","title":{"rendered":"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"15687\" class=\"elementor elementor-15687\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-6b09bceb e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"6b09bceb\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-a9859f3 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"a9859f3\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-xl\">Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101\n<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-42dd5e5 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"42dd5e5\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>It\u2019s been a fruitful year for the US which saw a series of reforms introduced to restructure the section of the Patent Act, especially 35 U.S.C. 101 &amp; 102. One such step is the introduction of a draft bill text which proposes to abrogate the requirement of judicial exception scrutiny, as mentioned in 35 U.S.C. 101, along with a few other changes to the legislative language of this section.<\/p>\n<p>The draft text adds sub-section 100 (k) to describe the term \u201cuseful\u201d as \u201cany invention or discovery that provides specific and practical utility in any field of technology through human intervention.\u201d This goes onto establish the Diamond v Chakrabarty judgment. However, this can also be threatening for inventions wherein human intervention is not required, as in the automation system, and maybe dampening the growth of such processes.<\/p>\n<p>Further, 35 U.S.C. 101 was given a simplified meaning by replacing the phrase \u201cnew and useful\u201d with just \u201cuseful\u201d thereby eliminating the requirement of the invention to be both novel and useful in order to be patent-eligible. Also, the eligibility under this section is now to be determined by considering the claimed invention as a whole together with all the mentioned claim limitations.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, Section 112 (f) was also restructured to take care of generic way of expressing an element in a claim by its function and not limiting to a particular structure (for instance a writing device is mentioned in a claim, which can be a pen, pencil, marker etc.), by limiting the scope of these to cover the corresponding structure as described in the specification of the patent application and its equivalents.<\/p>\n<p>However, the major revamp of this bill is the abrogation of \u201cjudicial exceptions\u201d which is a factor in determining patent eligibility of an invention. According to this, the subject matter eligibility of an invention will not be determined by judicially created exceptions including abstract ideas, laws of nature or natural phenomena, thereby keeping the exclusions limited only to fundamental scientific principles, mathematical formula, mental activities, or the like, as mentioned in the statutory.<\/p>\n<p>Overall this is considered to be a positive step to promote patenting activity in the US and doing away with exceptions which were created by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<h2>Resources:<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>Draft bill for 35 U.S.C., May 22, 2019<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tillis.senate.gov\/services\/files\/E8ED2188-DC15-4876-8F51-A03CF4A63E26\">https:\/\/www.tillis.senate.gov\/services\/files\/E8ED2188-DC15-4876-8F51-A03CF4A63E26<\/a><\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>35 U.S.C. 101<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/101_step1_refresher.pdf\">https:\/\/www.uspto.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/101_step1_refresher.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Related Search terms:<\/h2>\n<p>35 U.S.C. 100, 35 U.S.C. 100 (k), 35 U.S.C. 101, draft bill, patent-eligible, judicial exceptions, Senators Thom Tillis, Chris Coons<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 It\u2019s been a fruitful year for the US which saw a series of reforms introduced to restructure the section of the Patent Act, especially 35 U.S.C. 101 &amp; 102. One such step is the introduction of a draft bill text which proposes to abrogate the requirement of judicial [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.7 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 - Legal Advantage<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 - Legal Advantage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 It\u2019s been a fruitful year for the US which saw a series of reforms introduced to restructure the section of the Patent Act, especially 35 U.S.C. 101 &amp; 102. One such step is the introduction of a draft bill text which proposes to abrogate the requirement of judicial [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Advantage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-02-13T08:46:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-12T08:50:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"legaladvantage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"legaladvantage\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"legaladvantage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/265948e08c42b20a73df94b3f39f4e54\"},\"headline\":\"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-13T08:46:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-12T08:50:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":444,\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/\",\"name\":\"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 - Legal Advantage\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-02-13T08:46:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-12T08:50:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/265948e08c42b20a73df94b3f39f4e54\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Advantage\",\"description\":\"Intellectual Property &amp; Legal Support Services\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/265948e08c42b20a73df94b3f39f4e54\",\"name\":\"legaladvantage\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/58b4c8871c8c764275b19a20cd779f8ced96d8e492b1c675a59645896eaa64d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/58b4c8871c8c764275b19a20cd779f8ced96d8e492b1c675a59645896eaa64d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/58b4c8871c8c764275b19a20cd779f8ced96d8e492b1c675a59645896eaa64d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"legaladvantage\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/legaladvantage.net\\\/author\\\/legaladvantage\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 - Legal Advantage","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 - Legal Advantage","og_description":"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 It\u2019s been a fruitful year for the US which saw a series of reforms introduced to restructure the section of the Patent Act, especially 35 U.S.C. 101 &amp; 102. One such step is the introduction of a draft bill text which proposes to abrogate the requirement of judicial [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/","og_site_name":"Legal Advantage","article_published_time":"2020-02-13T08:46:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-12T08:50:34+00:00","author":"legaladvantage","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"legaladvantage","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/"},"author":{"name":"legaladvantage","@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/#\/schema\/person\/265948e08c42b20a73df94b3f39f4e54"},"headline":"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101","datePublished":"2020-02-13T08:46:40+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-12T08:50:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/"},"wordCount":444,"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/","url":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/","name":"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101 - Legal Advantage","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-02-13T08:46:40+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-12T08:50:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/#\/schema\/person\/265948e08c42b20a73df94b3f39f4e54"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/2020\/02\/draft-bill-to-reform-35-u-s-c-101\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Draft Bill to Reform 35 U.S.C. 101"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/","name":"Legal Advantage","description":"Intellectual Property &amp; Legal Support Services","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/#\/schema\/person\/265948e08c42b20a73df94b3f39f4e54","name":"legaladvantage","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b4c8871c8c764275b19a20cd779f8ced96d8e492b1c675a59645896eaa64d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b4c8871c8c764275b19a20cd779f8ced96d8e492b1c675a59645896eaa64d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/58b4c8871c8c764275b19a20cd779f8ced96d8e492b1c675a59645896eaa64d3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"legaladvantage"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/legaladvantage.net"],"url":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/author\/legaladvantage\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15687"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15687\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15699,"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15687\/revisions\/15699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legaladvantage.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}