<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Legal Advantage</provider_name><provider_url>https://legaladvantage.net</provider_url><author_name>legaladvantage</author_name><author_url>https://legaladvantage.net/author/legaladvantage/</author_url><title>Analyzing the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance FacebookTwitterShare - Legal Advantage</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ghh6NfuZmc"&gt;&lt;a href="https://legaladvantage.net/2019/02/analyzing-the-2019-revised-patent-subject-matter-eligibility-guidance-facebooktwittershare/"&gt;Analyzing the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance FacebookTwitterShare&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://legaladvantage.net/2019/02/analyzing-the-2019-revised-patent-subject-matter-eligibility-guidance-facebooktwittershare/embed/#?secret=ghh6NfuZmc" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Analyzing the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance FacebookTwitterShare&#x201D; &#x2014; Legal Advantage" data-secret="ghh6NfuZmc" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://legaladvantage.net/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>Analyzing the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance FacebookTwitterShare On January 7, 2019, USPTO (The United States Patent &amp; Trademark Office) published its revised set of guidance to provide clarity on subject matter eligibility criteria (35 U.S.C 101) for patentable inventions and sought public suggestions for the same. These revised set of procedures put [&hellip;]</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.legaladvantage.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/35-U.-S.C.-101.png</thumbnail_url></oembed>
